Close Menu
  • Cyber security
    • Malware
    • Mobile security
  • Computer Security
  • Cyber news
    • Data breaches
  • Cyber law & Compliance
  • About us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Cyber infos
Join us
  • Cyber security
    • Malware
    • Mobile security
  • Computer Security
  • Cyber news
    • Data breaches
  • Cyber law & Compliance
  • About us
Cyber infos
Home » DOGE Website Flaw: Unsecured Database Allowed Direct Edits
Cyber news

DOGE Website Flaw: Unsecured Database Allowed Direct Edits

Cyber infosBy Cyber infosFebruary 17, 2025Updated:February 17, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Pinterest Email LinkedIn Copy Link Threads Reddit Telegram
Follow Us
WhatsApp X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn Telegram
Share
WhatsApp Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Telegram Copy Link Pinterest Threads Reddit

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) makes national headlines, but probably not as the department had hoped.

Its  official website was found to be under an open security vulnerability where undesired users could convert content, resulting in a crash of expectations that the department could ever handle sensitive data.

This naturally raises the issues of government-affiliated websites’ security practices and a hastily created platform’s risks.

The ROGUE website launched in January was touted as showing how the department intended to cut back on government spending.

The site remained abandoned for weeks, featuring a cartoonish logo and little else. Recent changes made to the site found a glaring flaw that it was pulling from an external unsecured database, easily allowing third parties to change its materials.

Table of Contents hide
1 How the Security Flaw was Discovered
2 What Went Wrong with the DOGE Website?
3 The Fallout: Exposure of Classified Information and Legal Problems in Connection with the Same
4 Lessons from DOGE Website Breach
5 Final thoughts

How the Security Flaw was Discovered

The weakness was first reported by 404Media, who had two web development experts alert it to the possibility. The said website, doge.gov., connected a database that was publicly accessible.

This would allow anyone with basic technical knowledge to update the contents of the site, which would then be seen live.

This loophole was soon abused as users copied some messages onto the homepage. One such message read, “This is a joke of a .gov site,” while another has it thus: “THESE “EXPERTS” LEFT THEIR DATABASE OPEN – roro.” These messages were on view for long hours, and such is the seriousness of the matter.

What Went Wrong with the DOGE Website?

Experts studying the said site noted that it clearly appeared to have been hastily constructed. The page source code was full of idiosyncrasies, thus disclosing sensitive information, which would easily characterize it as a target of exploitation.

Sam Curry, a coding expert, is said to have told that this site was developed as hosting by Burst Data, a current DOGE employee-managed company.

The images were delivered through Cloudflare’s ImageDelivery service, although it seems to have done little in changing the fundamental security flaws. The incident has raised questions about the department’s databank handling practices and whether it can maintain secure systems.

The Fallout: Exposure of Classified Information and Legal Problems in Connection with the Same

The DOGE website was believed to have displayed classified intelligence before the hack, encompassing the figures and personnel of a US intelligence agency. Such disclosures of sensitive information would nudge more scrutiny focused on the department’s operations.

Questions have been raised among critics concerning conflicts of interest, as well as access to government data within the department. Numerous lawsuits have arisen against DOGE, questioning its authority and practices. The incident has certainly ignited further debate on the need for stricter cybersecurity measures  in government-affiliated projects.

Lessons from DOGE Website Breach

The breach clearly proves that the web development practices might have been really poor. Security must always come first in government websites when dealing with sensitive data and public confidence.

In this case, DOGE would have ruffled the age-old issue that development should never be rushed without proper testing and oversight.

Implement secure databases and access controls, and conduct frequent security audits to avoid similar cases.

Currently, the DOGE team has rectified such website issues, but the repair of its reputation may take a significant amount of time.

Final thoughts

The incident of the hack of the DOGE website puts in place stringent cybersecurity protocols in government projects. Even though the issues have been addressed in the department, this incident does tarnish its credibility.

Henceforth, organizations like DOGE should lay more emphasis on protecting security and building integrity for avoiding such breaches in the future today.

It serves as a warning for all government-affiliated websites and simple secure development practices and cost savings around risks. It is an ever-changing story that measures will have to progress along with technology.

Follow on X (Twitter) Follow on Instagram Follow on LinkedIn Follow on WhatsApp Follow on Telegram
Share. Twitter Email WhatsApp Copy Link
Previous ArticleWhy Router Security Should Be Your Top Priority
Next Article Google’s AI Security Feature: A New Thing for Chrome Users
Cyber infos
  • Website

Related Posts

Cyber news

Google Maps Review Extortion: New Feature Lets Businesses Report Fake Reviews and Scams

November 9, 2025
Cyber news

AI Tools Promoted by Threat Actors: How Artificial Intelligence Is Fueling a New Era of Cybercrime

November 7, 2025
Cyber news

Pentest Copilot: AI-Powered Ethical Hacking Tool Redefining Penetration Testing

October 30, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Search
Recent post
  • Google Maps Review Extortion: New Feature Lets Businesses Report Fake Reviews and Scams
  • AI Tools Promoted by Threat Actors: How Artificial Intelligence Is Fueling a New Era of Cybercrime
  • Pentest Copilot: AI-Powered Ethical Hacking Tool Redefining Penetration Testing
  • Top 10 Best API Security Testing Tools in 2025
  • OpenAI Atlas Browser Vulnerability Exposes ChatGPT Memory to Malicious Code Injection
  • Cybersecurity Newsletter Weekly – October 20 -26, 2025
Archives
Recents

Google Maps Review Extortion: New Feature Lets Businesses Report Fake Reviews and Scams

November 9, 2025

AI Tools Promoted by Threat Actors: How Artificial Intelligence Is Fueling a New Era of Cybercrime

November 7, 2025

Pentest Copilot: AI-Powered Ethical Hacking Tool Redefining Penetration Testing

October 30, 2025

Top 10 Best API Security Testing Tools in 2025

October 29, 2025
Pages
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Sitemaps
  • Terms and conditions
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest WhatsApp
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemaps
© 2025 Cyberinfos - All rights are reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.